[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 23, Issue 92 (10-2026) ::
سفینه 2026, 23(92): 63-80 Back to browse issues page
The Agency of ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd al-ʿAmrī: A Critical Reassessment of Edmund Hayes’s View in Agents of the Hidden Imam
Abstract:   (63 Views)
The official Imami account of the institution of the agents (al-sufarāʾ), first subjected to historical criticism in Verena Klemm’s article, has recently been revisited—albeit through a different but broadly convergent formulation—in Edmund Hayes’s Agents of the Hidden Imam. Emphasizing that, apart from reports deriving from Hibat Allāh al-Kātib, no explicit and early evidence is available for the agency of ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd after the death of Imam al-Ḥasan al-ʿAskarī, Hayes questions both the very agency of ʿUthmān and his precedence over his son, Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān. He further reinforces this doubt by relying on Hibat Allāh al-Kātib’s report concerning the duration of Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān’s activity. A closer examination of these two pieces of evidence, however, reveals significant shortcomings in Hayes’s analysis. The report concerning the duration of Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān’s activity does not explicitly establish that his independent agency began before that of ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd. Moreover, reports independent of Hibat Allāh al-Kātib portray ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd as the Imam’s successor, a mediator of his statements and commands, and an individual whose authority was binding; they also explicitly attest to Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān’s succession after him. More importantly, in the reports confirming the authority of the younger al-ʿAmrī, the agency of the father is treated as an established premise, while the son’s agency is understood as the continuation of, and succession to, his father’s office. Consequently, Hayes’s evidence does not undermine ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd’s precedence over Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān. Rather, the cumulative evidence supports the continuity of ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd’s position at the beginning of the Minor Occultation and the subsequent succession of Muḥammad b. ʿUthmān.
Keywords: ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd al-ʿAmrī, institution of agency, Four Agents, Minor Occultation, Edmund Hayes, Agents of the Hidden Imam.
Full-Text [PDF 935 kb]   (115 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/09/21 | Accepted: 2026/10/2 | Published: 2026/10/2
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

The Agency of ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd al-ʿAmrī: A Critical Reassessment of Edmund Hayes’s View in Agents of the Hidden Imam. سفینه 2026; 23 (92) :63-80
URL: http://safinahmagazine.ir/article-1-1784-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 92 (10-2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سفینه Safineh Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774