fa بررسی تطبیقی مبانی هرمنوتیست های قصد گرا و متفکران مسلمان تخصصي Special پژوهشي Research <span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:21.5pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="vertical-align:middle"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">هرمنوتیست</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">های قصدگرا و تأویل</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">گرایان مسلمان گرچه هردو به دنبال فهم مراد و قصد مؤلّف از متن</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">اند، ولی مبانی تفسیری مکاتب، امر تعیین کننده برای تفاوت</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">های تفسیری</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">اند. از این رو شناخت مبانی این دو مکتب، هدف این مقاله</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-YE" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt"> قرار گرفت</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt"> و </span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-YE" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">نسبت بین این دو مکتب تأویلی از نظر مبانی مورد بحث و تحلیل مقایسه</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-YE" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">ای قرار گرفت. </span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">در مقایسۀ پیش</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">فرض</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">های دو مکتب نشان داده شد که در </span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-YE" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">برخی مبانی همچون فهم پذیری متون، مبنا بودن زبان در فهم و قصد، عینی بودن معنا، معنای نهایی متن، نسبی بودن فهم از متن، اشتراک دارند؛ ولی در برخی مبانی همچون تاریخی نگری، ابتناء کشف قصد بر حدس _ که هرمنوتیک قصدی بدان باور دارد _ و نه عقل، افتراق دارند. همچنین متن (قرآنی) به دلیل علیم بودن مؤلف آن اختلاف و تناقض ندارد که آن را از هر متن دیگر ممتاز می</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-YE" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">سازد.</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt"> نیز در خصوص مبنای تاریخی نگری بین دو مکتب نشان داده شد این دو مبنا با هم اختلاف دارد. داده ها، آشکارا نشانگر این تفاوت</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">ها و اشتراک</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">ها بین مبانی دو مکتب</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">اند که در پایان به شکل جدولی مقایسه</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">‌</span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:13.0pt"><span style="font-family:w_Lotus"><span style="color:black"><span style="letter-spacing:-.05pt">ای ارائه شده است.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br> &nbsp; <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: rtl-font, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: justify; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline !important; float: none;">Objective hermeneutists and Muslim interpreters, although both are into understanding of author&#39;s intention, due to interpretive basis of paradigms being essential factor for interpretation differences, the goal of this essay is to understand basis of these two paradigms. Also, the relation of these two interpretive paradigms has been analysed comparatively, Comparing the defaults of these two paradigms, it is shown that for some basis like understandability of texts, language being basic in understanding and intention, meaning being objective, final meaning of texts, texts understanding being subjective, there are some similarities. However, in some other basis like: historisation, intention recognition being made on guessing- which is believed by intentional hermeneutics- and not wisdom, differs from each other. Also, text (Quran) has no contradiction and discrepancy due to its author being knowledgeable (Alim) and this, makes it distinguishable from all other texts. In the mean time, it has been shown that there are some differences between these two paradigmes as far as historisation point of view is concerned, Datum clearly show these similarities as well as differences between these two paradigms. To show these statistics as clearly as possible, the results of the discussions in this essay has been shown in a comparative table at the end of essay.</span> قصدگرایی, مبانی و پیشفرضها, معنای متن, هرمنوتیک. ",Intentionalism",, ",Author's Intention",, ",Basis and Defaults",, ",Text Meaning",, ",Hermeneutics", 94 116 http://safinahmagazine.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-359&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Mohammad Saeed Ansari محمدسعید انصاری msa907@gmail.com 10031947532846001561 10031947532846001561 No دانشکده الهیات دانشگاه تهران Mansoor Pahlevan منصور پهلوان pahlevan@ut.ac.ir 10031947532846001562 10031947532846001562 No دانشده الهیات دانشگاه تهران Mohammad Reza Shahroodi محمدرضا شاهرودی mhshahroodi@ut.ac.ir 10031947532846001563 10031947532846001563 Yes دانشکده الهیات دانشگاه تهران